barker
2012-04-12 04:37:42 UTC
I could not to factorrize the number of 156 six and ended in one.
Ludovicus
Why? This is trivial and it took me only a few minutes to solveLudovicus
6(10^157-1)/9-5 = A * B where A and B are both prime, A<B
A = 628486628437275763243226019561267587348336747741014522686317
and
B = 106074916553805623004662881363542072346327989634793446610616
80154739676571597744074392683606884633
I logged in only to see if anyone solved my little problem or
trick in the same newsgroups:
Subject: Factorization theory wrong? Or algorithmic error?
Message-ID: <***@...........>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 22:19 UTC
One person only solved this:
Pertti's Ghost <lounesto-***@helsinki.edu.fi>
by understanding what is the meaning of "factorizing", and what is
the meaning of "almost", when is April 1 and other issues.
Some other are near misses - but only PG got all the points correct.
Most humiliatingly incorrect was:
Pubkeybreaker <***@aol.com>
but no more can be expected from AO Luser or Dullrich.
Thank you,
"barker" (associate of the late falsified Dr Pertti Lounesto)